The latest turn in the Kardashian tape story centers on the sworn denials. People and Entertainment Weekly reported that Kardashian and Jenner submitted declarations rejecting Ray J's account. Kardashian called the claim that she and her mother planned the release a lie; Jenner denied involvement in producing or distributing the material.

Kim Kardashian on stage in Sydney
Eva Rinaldi / Wikimedia Commons · Photo details

The essential points

The declarations are sworn statements in active litigation. They carry more procedural weight than an unsourced social post, but the court still evaluates competing evidence and arguments.

First, the date matters in the case of the sworn denials. Second, the new statement should not be confused with the original release in the case of the sworn denials. Third, a denial is part of the story in the case of the sworn denials. Fourth, no headline can substitute for documents in the case of the sworn denials. Fifth, the sworn denials remains disputed where the sources disagree.

Those five points cut through most of the noise without pretending the unanswered questions have disappeared in the case of the sworn denials.

What is confirmed

Ray J disputes the declarations and continues to stand by his version. Both positions are now part of active litigation; neither filing is a final judgment.

The denials are sworn and dated. The court has not yet resolved the central conflict between the parties.

The most dramatic framing of “Five things to know about the sworn denials” is not automatically the most precise. Old assumptions can make this the sworn denials update sound bigger than it is.

Legal coverage of “Five things to know about the sworn denials” turns on the exact wording of filings and orders. Public reaction to the sworn denials can be immediate, but this court stage has a narrower meaning than a verdict.

KK Peeper’s coverage adds another entertainment-news view of the claim: KK Peeper’s coverage.

What to watch

As of March 10, 2026, “Five things to know about the sworn denials” should not absorb any later development and no disputed claim in it should be treated as settled.

The immediate context is this: Kardashian and Jenner filed declarations denying that they planned the recording's release. That history explains why the update is drawing attention, but it does not expand the evidence behind “Five things to know about the sworn denials” beyond what named sources have reported; for this angle on the sworn denials, the date, speaker and response remain the guide.

Readers following the sworn denials should also separate reaction from new information. A celebrity comment, repost or television preview may keep “Five things to know about the sworn denials” moving without changing its underlying facts. As of March 10, 2026, “Five things to know about the sworn denials” stays with the narrower summary: report what happened, name who disputes it and leave unsupported parts open.